I write a lot these days. Luckily, most of the time I am my only audience. This is good because I am writing behind closed doors and no one is reading and judging what I write. But its bad because its me alone with my thoughts. Which sometimes turn into a wild jungle of scary jibberish.
Soon I am going to have to write this all into a story about rice where I have to balance the stories of the people I meet with the story I want to tell. Somehow I am going to have to make that work. But for now I write to process and evaluate (and constantly re-evaluate) what I am doing here. Sometimes I think about things and write them out and that writing process leaves me with 5 new threads of ideas to carry out. Those are the days when writing is good. Other times I write and I am trying to confront or figure out a problem and I keep wrapping myself back to the original question or problem. I guess that is the nature of something as complicated as social science.
For example, I feel like I have spent a lot of time trying to understand why people think the rice I am studying is good rice. So I have asked people what aspects or qualities they look for when buying rice. I am trying to get to the bottom of this question by making it complicated when sometimes it appears as simple as this: it’s the only rice they really can buy here because it’s the local rice. They are used to this rice and its readily available and fairly cheap so its what they eat. But I tell myself it has to be more complicated than that so I keep asking people to explain it to me and I continue to get the exact same answers. It has taken me a lot of time to be able to synthesize all of my ideas into this simple paragraph. But I am constantly confronting the original question and wondering at what point do I leave it alone and move on or try to dig further and pull deeper meaning from it all. And maybe now is not necessarily the time for me to even be thinking about this and I should just be doing it. But I can’t do it without thinking about it. And I am drawn back into a cycle…
Its times like these when I need to laugh at the entire process of writing. Because writing is thinking and good writing is the outcome of the combination of bad writing and good thinking. To make light of this situation, here is a link to one of my favorite scenes from one of my favorite TV characters, Lorelai Gilmore of the Gilmore Girls. I love this character because her mind works like my mind. But unlike me (who keeps my incoherent thoughts to myself to maintain the image of sanity), Lorelai just lets it go.
In this scene she is trying to write a letter, but nothing is coming out. It makes me laugh (and as a bonus she references Casablanca and the Bush White House in one breath-[Casa Blanca=White House in spanish]).
One final note: I think that a lot of my thoughts about writing come (surprisingly) from Steven King. The only book by Steven King I have read the entire way through was a memoir/guide to writing called
On Writing. I bought this book a few years ago on the street in Beijing the day before a 13-hour plane ride to the US. By the time I got home, I had finished the book. I realize my writing is much different from Steven King’s, but I appreciated the ways he synthesized the process of writing. Whether its weird science fiction or rice preferences in China, writing is a process shared by many.